A Secondary Modeling Approach for Air Quality Prediction Based on LSTM-FC Multi-model Fusion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v6n3.25Keywords:
Information industry, Industry linkages, Weight, Skewness, Kurtosis, Non competitive modelAbstract
Aiming at the insufficient forecasting accuracy of the traditional WRF-CMAQ model due to meteorological field uncertainty and emission inventory errors, this paper proposes a secondary modeling framework that integrates multi-source data with deep learning. The multi-pollutant concentration prediction accuracy is significantly improved by introducing the pseudo-unique thermal coded wind feature reconstruction, CEEMDAN adaptive noise cancellation technique, and combining the random forest feature selection with the LSTM-FNN combined model. Experiments show that the method has a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.76 μg/m³ in PM2.5 prediction at monitoring points A, B, and C, which is 8.3% lower than that of a single model, and its MAE is reduced to 13.53 μg/m³ for the CEEMDAN_IPSOSE_SVR model for ozone (O3), which is a 21% decrease from the baseline. The model achieves 92.7% accuracy in the identification of the top pollutants, and the relative error of AQI prediction is only 6.2%. This study provides a highly interpretable and robust technical solution for regional air quality forecasting.
Downloads
References
[1] Cohen, A. J., et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015.The Lancet389(10082), 1907-1918 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6
[2] Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wang L, et al. Application of WRF/Chem over East Asia: Part I. Model evaluation and intercomparison with MM5/CMAQ [J]. Atmospheric environment, 2016, 124: 285-300.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.07.022
[3] Zhang Z, Zeng Y, Yan K. A hybrid deep learning technology for PM 2.5 air quality forecasting [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28: 39409-39422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12657-8
[4] Zhan, Y., et al. Deep learning for ozone prediction: A hybrid approach combining chemical transport models and surface observations. Environmental Science & Technology 55(8), 4583-4592 (2021).
[5] Wang Z, Chen H, Zhu J, et al. Multi-scale deep learning and optimal combination ensemble approach for AQI forecasting using big data with meteorological conditions [J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 40(3): 5483-5500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-202481
[6] Sillman S. The relation between ozone, NOx and hydrocarbons in urban and polluted rural environments [J]. Atmospheric environment, 1999, 33(12): 1821-1845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00345-8
[7] Yan X, Zang Z, Jiang Y, et al. A Spatial-Temporal Interpretable Deep Learning Model for improving interpretability and predictive accuracy of satellite-based PM2. 5 [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 273: 116459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116459
[8] TIBSHIRANI R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso_ a retrospective [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00771.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Global Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
