Analysis on the Linkage Between ESG Disclosure and Audit Quality from the Perspective of Corporate Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n9.06Keywords:
ESG information disclosure, Audit quality, Corporate governance, Third-party assurance, Linkage mechanismAbstract
The disclosure of ESG information is gradually shifting from a voluntary practice to an institutional obligation. This has expanded the information border of organisations and has resulted in changes in the structure of corporate governance. In April 2024, the Shanghai, Shenzhen and North Stock Exchanges released Guidelines for Sustainable Development Reports of Listed Companies. In 2025, China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) respectively updated the information disclosure and governance rules, which put sustainable development reports in the required disclosure scope. As of the end of 2025, 1,869 listed companies produced sustainability reports, representing 34.7% of all listed companies and over 70% of total market capitalisation. Of them, 67.3% had built governance structures and 44.0% had defined quantitative targets. In July 2025, the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants released the draft of the "Guidelines for Sustainable Information Assurance" to create a regulatory basis for non-financial information assurance. From the perspective of corporate governance, the relationship between the two is an integrated governance loop, not a one-way flow of information, in three ways: optimising the information environment, changing the governance structure, and implanting the audit mechanism. Information disclosure minimises information asymmetry in audits. The assurance system creates a new layer of supervision for non-financial information assurance. They are mutually reinforcing and together offer an interactive system for governance through transparency and disclosure through auditing.
Downloads
References
[1] Bernardi, C., & Stark, A. W. (2018). Environmental, social and governance disclosure, integrated reporting, and the accuracy of analyst forecasts. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.10.001
[2] Abdullah, A., Yamak, S., Korzhenitskaya, A., Rahimi, R., & McClellan, J. (2024). Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 2250–2268. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3521
[3] Alodat, A. Y., & Hao, Y. (2025). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: moderating role of board gender diversity and sustainability committee. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2832
[4] Ling, S., Xia, H., & Liu, Z. F. (2024). ESG rating divergence and audit fees: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 67, 105749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105749
[5] Alshahrani, F., Eulaiwi, B., Duong, L., & Taylor, G. (2025). Climate change disclosure performance and audit fees: evidence from Australia. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 16(5), 1208–1242. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2023-0509
[6] Zhu, R., Zhao, Y. Y., & Sun, M. (2023). The performance capacity of audit committees and the quality of ESG information disclosure. Friends of Accounting, (18), 28–37.
[7] Du, L. Z., & Tong, X. R. (2026). Research on the impact of listed companies‘ ESG performance on audit quality: The moderating role of internal control quality. Economic Problems, (1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2026.01.013
[8] Ruiz Barbadillo, E., & Martínez Ferrero, J. (2020). Empirical analysis of the effect of the joint provision of audit and sustainability assurance services on assurance quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121943
[9] Asante Appiah, B., & Lambert, T. A. (2023). The role of the external auditor in managing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reputation risk. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(4), 2589–2641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09706-z
[10] Lin, Y., Shen, R., Wang, J., & Yu, Y. J. (2024). Global evolution of environmental and social disclosure in annual reports. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(5), 1941–1988. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12575
[11] Van Bommel, K., Rasche, A., & Spicer, A. (2023). From values to value: The commensuration of sustainability reporting and the crowding out of morality. Organization & Environment, 36(1), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221086617
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.