Exploration of Human–Robot Collaborative Two-Sided Assembly Line Optimization Based on Workload Balancing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n3.15Keywords:
Human–robot collaboration, Workload, Assembly line balancing, Multi-objective optimization, Migrating birds optimization algorithmAbstract
In the context of Industry 4.0, collaborative robots, as a key enabler of intelligent manufacturing, are increasingly being introduced into assembly environments, forming a novel human–robot collaborative paradigm with workers. This study focuses on the optimal allocation of human–robot collaborative assembly tasks in two-sided assembly line scenarios. A systematic investigation is conducted on assembly line balancing modeling methods incorporating both physical and cognitive workload evaluation mechanisms. On this basis, a multi-objective optimization model is developed with production cycle time, cost, working time, and workload balance as the primary objectives. Furthermore, the conventional Migrating Birds Optimization (MBO) algorithm is extended to a multi-objective framework and enhanced with adaptive improvement strategies to improve solution effectiveness and distribution. The results provide theoretical support and methodological insights for developing human-centric and efficiency-oriented collaborative production systems.
Downloads
References
[1] Hu, C. Exploration of application models of collaborative robots in industrial production. Mould Manufacturing, Vol. 25(6), pp. 243–245, 2025.
[2] Zhong, W., Li, J., Ge, R., et al. A brief analysis of the application of collaborative robots in automotive final assembly. China Equipment Engineering, Vol. (S2), pp. 351–353, 2024.
[3] Chen, X., Tong, M., & Xiu, S. Application and development of human–robot collaborative robots in the automotive final assembly industry. Precision Manufacturing and Automation, Vol. (03), pp.1–4, 2020.
[4] Guan, M., Yuan, P., & Wang, S. Study on bilateral assembly line balancing problem based on hybrid fruit fly algorithm. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 31(1), pp.56–66, 2025.
[5] Lan, Y., Wu, J., Yan, H., et al. Comparative study of bus driver posture risk assessment using OWAS, RULA, and REBA. Chinese Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 38(2), pp. 118+125+119–124, 2025.
[6] Yu, S., Jia, N., Xu, M., et al. Application and comparison of OWAS and RULA posture load assessment methods in the steel industry. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, Vol. 41(2), pp. 166–171, 2023.
[7] Biondi, F. N., Cacanindin, A., Douglas, C., & Cort, J. Overloaded and at Work: Investigating the Effect of Cognitive Workload on Assembly Task Performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 63(5), pp. 813–820, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820929928
[8] Dalle Mura, M., & Dini, G. Job rotation and human–robot collaboration for enhancing ergonomics in assembly lines by a genetic algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.118(9-10), pp.2901–2914, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08068-1
[9] Lee, T. O., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. K. Two-sided assembly line balancing to maximize work relatedness and slackness. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 40(3), pp.273–292, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(01)00029-8
[10] Mao, Z., Sun, Y., Fang, K., Huang, D., & Zhang, J. Balancing and scheduling of assembly line with multi-type collaborative robots. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 271, pp.109207, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109207
[11] Nourmohammadi, A., Fathi, M., & Ng, A. H. C. Balancing and scheduling assembly lines with human-robot collaboration tasks. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 140, pp.105674, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2021.105674
[12] Otto, A., & Scholl, A. Incorporating ergonomic risks into assembly line balancing. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 212(2), pp.277–286, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.056
[13] Ren, B., Zhou, Q., & Chen, J. Assessing cognitive workloads of assembly workers during multi-task switching. Scientific Reports, Vol. 13(1), 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43477-0
[14] Stecke, K. E., & Mokhtarzadeh, M. (2021). Balancing collaborative human–robot assembly lines to optimise cycle time and ergonomic risk. International Journal of Production Research, pp.1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1989077
[15] Wang, L., Gao, R., Váncza, J., Krüger, J., Wang, X. V., Makris, S., & Chryssolouris, G. Symbiotic human-robot collaborative assembly. CIRP Annals, Vol. 68(2), pp.701–726, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.002
[16] Weckenborg, C., Kieckhäfer, K., Müller, C., Grunewald, M., & Spengler, T. S. Balancing of assembly lines with collaborative robots. Business Research, Vol. 13(1), pp.93–132, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0101-y
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Global Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
