The Influence of Brand Type on Product Choices: The Mediating Role of Need for Uniqueness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n2.10Keywords:
Brand type, Luxury, Need for uniqueness, Product choice, AestheticsAbstract
This study investigates how brand type (luxury vs. non-luxury) influences consumer product choices between attractive and ugly designs. We propose that for non-luxury brands, consumers exhibit a stronger preference for attractive products, while for luxury brands, choices between attractive and ugly products show no significant difference. Need for uniqueness serves as a mediator in this relationship. Drawing on Customers' need for uniqueness theory and aesthetics literature, we develop a theoretical framework and hypotheses. The findings contribute to understanding aesthetic paradoxes in luxury consumption.
Downloads
References
[1] Gilal N G, Zhang J, Gilal F G, 2018. Linking product design to consumer behavior: the moderating role of consumption experience [J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Volume 11: 169-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S161384
[2] Cesareo L, Townsend C, Pavlov E, 2023. Hideous but worth it: distinctive ugliness as a signal of luxury [J]. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 51(3): 636-657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00913-3
[3] Ko E, Costello J P, Taylor C R, 2019. What is a luxury brand? A new definition and review of the literature [J]. Journal of Business Research, 99: 405-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.023
[4] Wang Y, 2022. A conceptual framework of contemporary luxury consumption [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3): 788-803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.10.010
[5] Nie X, Wang L, Chan E Y, 2024. The luxury should be “high”: the effect of positioning in cobranding on luxury evaluation [J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 36(12): 3371-3387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-12-2023-1257
[6] Dinnie K, 2009. Luxury fashion branding — trends, tactics, techniques [J]. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5-6): 413-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.34
[7] Cohen A, 2013. Kant on the possibility of ugliness [J]. British Journal of Aesthetics, 53(2): 199-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayt002
[8] Hagtvedt H, 2022. A brand (new) experience: art, aesthetics, and sensory effects [J]. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 50(3): 425-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00833-8
[9] Leder H, Belke B, Oeberst A, et al., 2004. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments [J]. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4): 489-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
[10] Tian K T, Bearden W O, Hunter G L, 2001. Consumers’ need for uniqueness: scale development and validation [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1): 50-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/321947
[11] Ruvio A, Shoham A, Brencic M M, 2008. Consumers’ need for uniqueness: short-form scale development and cross-cultural validation [J]. International Marketing Review, 25(1): 33-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330810851872
[12] Hemonnet-Goujot A, Valette-Florence P, 2022. “all you need is love” from product design value perception to luxury brand love: an integrated framework [J]. Journal of Business Research, 139: 1463-1475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.066
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Global Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
